Nominal GDP Targeting
Recent months have witnessed an upsurge of interest in the idea that, to quote The Economist, “… rather than directing monetary policy to hit inflation targets (as they have done for the past 20 years) central banks should take aim at nominal GDP (or NGDP).” That is, the idea is that central banks should conduct monetary policy so as to keep the growth rate of aggregate nominal spending at a specified numerical value. This value would equal the sum of the central bank’s target inflation rate (say, 1.5% per annum) and the economy’s long-run average rate of output (real GDP) growth (say, 3.0%). The belief of supporters of the suggestion is that successful achievement of this objective would yield the same long-run average inflation rate as would achievement of an inflation target of 1.5%, and also the same long-run growth of output, but would do so with a reduced volatility of output fluctuations.Fiscal Dimensions of Inflationist Monetary Policy
The broad-based support for price stability is at risk today in the United States and in Europe. Prominent voices in academia, the media, the International Monetary Fund, and inside the Federal Reserve have proposed that the commitment to price stability should be relaxed in one way or another to concentrate on achieving more pressing objectives. The inflationist policy proposals are varied with respect to their objectives and operating guides. For instance, the objectives range from reducing unemployment, to depreciating the real public debt, to facilitating international adjustment within the Euro area. In the paper, I compare and contrast various inflationist proposals and consider their overall advisability in light of lessons from the Great Inflation.




In-Depth Research